Peter Bradshaw 

The Gambler review – Mark Wahlberg is unconvincing in a contrived remake

The 1974 film scripted by James Toback is relocated to Los Angeles, and turned into something pretty preposterous in the process, writes Peter Bradshaw
  
  

The Gambler film still
Not a good bet … The Gambler. Photograph: Claire Folger Photograph: Claire Folger

Writer and film-maker James Toback has had a mini-resurgence lately: his documentary Seduced and Abandoned was widely enjoyed, and Jacques Audiard remade his 1978 movie Fingers as The Beat My Heart Skipped. Now 1974’s Toback-scripted The Gambler has had a modern – rather sanitised – makeover, transposed from New York to LA. It’s another tellingly personal tale of a highbrow guy with a lowlife secret.

Mark Wahlberg plays the part that James Caan had in the original. He is Jim Bennett, a university professor and novelist with an addiction to gambling. Wahlberg is, sad to say, uncharismatic and unconvincing in a tiresome role in which he has to harangue his students on the subject of true genius. On his personal time, he loses a fortune at blackjack, and finally stakes everything on a plan to persuade one of his students to throw a high-stakes college basketball game.

Watch a video review

In many ways, it’s interesting to see a 70s-style movie, with its long conversational takes, transposed to a modern setting, although a 21st-century gambler might actually find it more convenient to blow it all online. Mark Wahlberg’s designer-suited performance is shallow and self-admiring, however, and William Monahan (who wrote The Departed) devises a new narrative direction which is contrived and preposterous. There are one or two nice, Elmore-Leonard-ish cracks about the movie business.

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*